MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CVSW2206952 SPARA VS NAMBIAR M.D ON BY KPC GLOBAL MEDICAL
CENTERS INC.
Tentative Ruling: Denied in its entirety on grounds set forth in the opposition papers.
Triable issues of material fact remain. See, e.g., Dr. Mandel’s declaration referenced in
plaintiffs’ separate statement of undisputed material facts, fact nos. 51, 56, 57,59. All of
defendants’ evidentiary objections are overruled. As to the motion for summary
adjudication, the motion is procedurally defective. Where summary adjudication of a
cause of action is sought, the notice must identify the “specific cause of action” sought to
be adjudicated. (CRC rule 3.1350(b).) Further, the separate statement of undisputed
material facts must separately identify each cause of action and each supporting material
fact claimed to be without dispute with respect to that cause of action. (CRC rule
3.1350(d).) “[T]he specific cause of actio
Hearing Date
May 22, 2024
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CVSW2206952 SPARA VS NAMBIAR M.D ON BY KPC GLOBAL MEDICAL
CENTERS INC.
Tentative Ruling: Denied in its entirety on grounds set forth in the opposition papers.
Triable issues of material fact remain. See, e.g., Dr. Mandel’s declaration referenced in
plaintiffs’ separate statement of undisputed material facts, fact nos. 51, 56, 57,59. All of
defendants’ evidentiary objections are overruled. As to the motion for summary
adjudication, the motion is procedurally defective. Where summary adjudication of a
cause of action is sought, the notice must identify the “specific cause of action” sought to
be adjudicated. (CRC rule 3.1350(b).) Further, the separate statement of undisputed
material facts must separately identify each cause of action and each supporting material
fact claimed to be without dispute with respect to that cause of action. (CRC rule
3.1350(d).) “[T]he specific cause of actio