TAVEGIA VS RIVERSIDE
CVRI2300581 FINAL APPROVAL/ FAIRNESS
PIZZA, INC.
Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss compliance with the CMO. It appears that
there are several omissions (CMO ¶¶s G(3)(a)(vii) (is counsel aware of other representative or
collective actions, declaration is limited to class actions and does not state whether a reasonable
inquiry was made of others at firm); G(3)(d)(i) (were bids from multiple potential settlement
administrators sought and if the lowest bidder was not selected, why?); G(3)(d)(ii) (is fee fixed,
hourly or hourly with a cap?); G(3)(i) (payment of employer’s share of payroll taxes--is this
addressed?) ; G(3)(k)(i)-(ii)(can we delete non-exempt and insert hourly?); G(4)(d) (proposed
order does not describe administrator’s duties); G(4)(h) (need a proposed final approval hearing
date); G(5)(a)(details to be provided). The compliance chart required by the CMO would be
helpfu
Hearing Date
May 23, 2024
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
TAVEGIA VS RIVERSIDE
CVRI2300581 FINAL APPROVAL/ FAIRNESS
PIZZA, INC.
Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss compliance with the CMO. It appears that
there are several omissions (CMO ¶¶s G(3)(a)(vii) (is counsel aware of other representative or
collective actions, declaration is limited to class actions and does not state whether a reasonable
inquiry was made of others at firm); G(3)(d)(i) (were bids from multiple potential settlement
administrators sought and if the lowest bidder was not selected, why?); G(3)(d)(ii) (is fee fixed,
hourly or hourly with a cap?); G(3)(i) (payment of employer’s share of payroll taxes--is this
addressed?) ; G(3)(k)(i)-(ii)(can we delete non-exempt and insert hourly?); G(4)(d) (proposed
order does not describe administrator’s duties); G(4)(h) (need a proposed final approval hearing
date); G(5)(a)(details to be provided). The compliance chart required by the CMO would be
helpfu