19CV43812
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR
ALTERNATIVELY SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Plaintiff alleges that she was paid a monthly food stipend of $1,000 during “grows,” and
was to be paid 10% of the gross proceeds of the cultivated cannabis, living at the
property during the two “grows” and provided some housekeeping assistance to
defendant’s father.
Defendant. brought a Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary
Adjudication on Dec. 11, 2023. The primary grounds for the motions are the
unenforceability of an illegal contract, i.e., unpermitted cannabis cultivation.
Defendant contends that he is entitled to summary judgment/adjudication because
plaintiff cannot recover on any of the causes of action stated in the Complaint (Breach
Of Oral Contract, Breach Of Written Contract, Common Count: Goods and Services
Rendered, Intentional Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, and False
Promise), as a matter of law, because of the claimed illegality of the
Hearing Date
March 01, 2024
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
19CV43812
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR
ALTERNATIVELY SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Plaintiff alleges that she was paid a monthly food stipend of $1,000 during “grows,” and
was to be paid 10% of the gross proceeds of the cultivated cannabis, living at the
property during the two “grows” and provided some housekeeping assistance to
defendant’s father.
Defendant. brought a Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary
Adjudication on Dec. 11, 2023. The primary grounds for the motions are the
unenforceability of an illegal contract, i.e., unpermitted cannabis cultivation.
Defendant contends that he is entitled to summary judgment/adjudication because
plaintiff cannot recover on any of the causes of action stated in the Complaint (Breach
Of Oral Contract, Breach Of Written Contract, Common Count: Goods and Services
Rendered, Intentional Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, and False
Promise), as a matter of law, because of the claimed illegality of the