arrow left
arrow right
  • Helen Siller INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY AS A SHAREHOLDER OF AND ON BEHALF OF THE THIRD BREVOORT CORP v. The Third Brevoort Corporation, Diane C Nardone, Cliff Russo, Elizabeth Louie, Andrew Baum, George Aloi, Christine Beck, Bonnie Hiller, Mortimor C Lazarus, Jane Warren, John C Woell, Barbara EisenbergReal Property - Other document preview
  • Helen Siller INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY AS A SHAREHOLDER OF AND ON BEHALF OF THE THIRD BREVOORT CORP v. The Third Brevoort Corporation, Diane C Nardone, Cliff Russo, Elizabeth Louie, Andrew Baum, George Aloi, Christine Beck, Bonnie Hiller, Mortimor C Lazarus, Jane Warren, John C Woell, Barbara EisenbergReal Property - Other document preview
						
                                

Preview

INDEX NO. 151313/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/07/2015 07:19 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/07/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK = sex Index No. 151313/2014 HELEN SILLER, Plaintiff, - against - AFFIRMATION OF DANIEL S. STEINBERG THE THIRD BREVOORT CORPORATION, DIANE IN OPPOSITION TO C, NARDONE, CLIFF RUSSO, ELIZABETH LOUIE, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION ANDREW BAUM, GEORGE ALOI, CHRISINE TO DISMISS THE SECOND BECK, BONNIE HILLER, MORTIMOR C. AMENDED COMPLAINT LAZARUS, JANE WARREN, JOHN C. WOELL and BARBARA EISENBERG, Defendants. ee erereeenaeae ee eE-. DANIEL S. STEINBERG, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the courts of the State of New York, affirms under penalty of perjury as follows: 1 I am of counsel to the firm The Law Office of Sheldon Eisenberger, attorneys for plaintiff Helen Siller, and submit this affirmation in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. 2 Submitted herewith is a true copy of an affidavit of plaintiff Helen Siller, sworn to May 7, 2014, including the exhibits thereto. The affidavit, which previously was submitted to this Court in connection with previous motion practice concerning the first amended complaint, includes the documentary evidence relevant to the present motion. WHEREFORE, defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint should be denied in its entirety together with such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Dated: New York, New York January 7, 2015 \ Daniel S. Stein eg