arrow left
arrow right
  • Rudman, Harvey, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively, Kuplesky, Harold, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively v. Carol Gram Deane, Disque D. Deane, Salt Kettle Llc, St. Gervais Llc, Starrett City Preservation Llc, Dd Spring Creek Llc, Sk Spring Creek Llc, Spring Creek Plaza Llc, Dd Shopping Center Llc, Sk Shopping Center Llc Commercial Division document preview
  • Rudman, Harvey, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively, Kuplesky, Harold, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively v. Carol Gram Deane, Disque D. Deane, Salt Kettle Llc, St. Gervais Llc, Starrett City Preservation Llc, Dd Spring Creek Llc, Sk Spring Creek Llc, Spring Creek Plaza Llc, Dd Shopping Center Llc, Sk Shopping Center Llc Commercial Division document preview
						
                                

Preview

GOLENBOGK EISEMAN Attorneys at Law 1 437 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10022-7020 ASSOR BELL & P~SKOE«P T (212) 907-7300 I F (212) 7540330 I www.golenbock.com DIRECT DIAL No.: (2 / Z) 907-739 / DiRECr Fax No.: !2 / 2) 754-0777 EMA/L ADDRESS: JIBE/T@GOLENBOCK. COM August 21, 2013 Via ECF Hon. Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich 60 Centre Street, Room 418 New York, New York 10007 Re: Harvey Rudman, et al. v. Carol Grarrc Deane, et al. Supreme Court, New York CountX Index No. 650159/2010 Dear Justice Kornreich: We are counsel to Plaintiffs in the above referenced case. Last week Plaintiffs filed their papers in opposition to Defendants' Motion for Siunmary Judgment, including the Affirmation of Jacqueline Veit in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ("Veit Affirmation") and Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Partial Siui~inary Judgment ("Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law"). We found certain errors that we wish to bring to the Court's attention. The hard copies of these documents filed with the Motion Support Office will contain the following corrections to the e-filed versions: Veit Affirmation Page and Paragraph Change Page 6 ¶ 18 "54:3-8" to "58:3-8" Page 7 ¶ 26 "allocate" in the quotation should be "reallocate" Page 12 ¶ 36(c) "D-E0018849" to "D-E0018854" Page 16 ¶ 41(e) "Recap093013" and "Recap093020" were reversed Page 18 ¶ 43(v), footnote 5 "Ex. D" to "Ex. E" GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE«P Hon. Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich August 21, 2013 Page 2 Page and Paragraph Change Page 21 ¶ 51 "Ex. 14 (Interrogs), at Ex. C" to "Ex. 4 (Carol Deane) at 87- 88." Page 22 ¶ 53 "Only in May 2010 was the cash put into Preservation and initial payments made ..." to "Only on March 24 and 25, 2010 was the cash put into Preservation and in May 2010 initial payments made" Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law Page Change Page 13, first paragraph "Sections 5.8(A) and 5.9(A)" to "Sections 4.8(A) and 4.9(A)" Page 18, first paragraph "~(~ 18-19" to "¶¶ 18-20" Page 22, last line of paragraph "~( 44" to "~ 41" r y submitt ,~i, r"`t""',~°. 'Ea~~~ ~~ ~ G'Lr~,,,~''~j` "~k„ 4.... G. Veit cc: Kenneth E. Warner, Esq. (via ECF) Steven Y. Yurowitz, Esq. (via ECF) Jonathan H. Friedman, Esq. (via ECF) 1840145.1