arrow left
arrow right
  • Rudman, Harvey, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively, Kuplesky, Harold, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively v. Carol Gram Deane, Disque D. Deane, Salt Kettle Llc, St. Gervais Llc, Starrett City Preservation Llc, Dd Spring Creek Llc, Sk Spring Creek Llc, Spring Creek Plaza Llc, Dd Shopping Center Llc, Sk Shopping Center Llc Commercial Division document preview
  • Rudman, Harvey, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively, Kuplesky, Harold, Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation Llc, Derivatively v. Carol Gram Deane, Disque D. Deane, Salt Kettle Llc, St. Gervais Llc, Starrett City Preservation Llc, Dd Spring Creek Llc, Sk Spring Creek Llc, Spring Creek Plaza Llc, Dd Shopping Center Llc, Sk Shopping Center Llc Commercial Division document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/2016 06:12 PM INDEX NO. 650159/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 415 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK HARVEY RUDMAN and HAROLD KUPLESKY, on Behalf of Each of Them Individually And On Behalf Of Starrett City Preservation LLC, Derivatively, Index No. 650159/10 Plaintiffs, - against - ATTORNEY’S REPLYAFFIRMATION IN CAROL GRAM DEANE, THE ESTATE OF DISQUE SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ D. DEANE by CAROL G. DEANE, MOTION TO DISMISS as TEMPORARY EXECUTRIX, SALT KETTLE LLC, ST. GERVAIS LLC, STARRETT CITY Assigned to Kornreich, J. PRESERVATION LLC, DD SPRING CREEK LLC, SK SPRING CREEK LLC, SPRING CREEK PLAZA Motion Sequence No. 010 LLC, DD SHOPPING CENTER LLC and SK SHOPPING CENTER LLC, Defendants. STEVEN Y. YUROWTIZ, an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the State of New York, affirms under penalties of perjury and says: 1. I am a member of Newman & Greenberg LLP, attorneys for Carol Deane individually, one of the defendants in the above-captioned action. I submit this reply affirmation in support of the motion of all defendants (except Spring Creek Plaza, LLC), pursuant to CPLR 3211, for an order dismissing the remaining claims alleged in plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint, except for that portion of plaintiffs’ Fifth Claim for Relief that disputes plaintiff Kuplesky’s proper Sharing Ratio. In further support of the motion, and for the Court’s convenience, I have attached copies of the documents to which defendants’ accompanying reply memorandum of law refers, true copies of which are contained in the files of the Court of Appeals, the Appellate Division, First Department, and probably this Court, and are not subject to dispute. 1 1 of 2 2. Exhibit F is a true copy of excerpts from the Affirmation of Jacqueline G. Veit, dated May 18, 2016, in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals, in this case. 3. Exhibit G is a true copy of excerpts from Plaintiffs’ Brief on Appeal, dated March 23, 2015, filed with the Appellate Division, First Department, in connection with Plaintiffs’ appeal from a decision and order of this Court, entered on or about July 30, 2014, and amended on or about September 24, 2014. WHEREFORE, your affiant respectfully requests that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in its entirety. ________________________ Steven Y. Yurowitz Affirmed this 18th day of November, 2016. 2 2 of 2