arrow left
arrow right
  • Rosalina Serrano v. Mta Bus Company, New York City Transit Authoriity, The City Of New York, John Doe (intending to describe the Operator of the Bus described in the attached Complaint) Tort document preview
  • Rosalina Serrano v. Mta Bus Company, New York City Transit Authoriity, The City Of New York, John Doe (intending to describe the Operator of the Bus described in the attached Complaint) Tort document preview
						
                                

Preview

EBs 2NEWSYO iz AS OUN tt EK DG DA nM 212 a0gTMPEX NO» IRALt 942012 re DOC. NO. 37 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ROSALINA SERRANO, Index No.: 159110/12 i Plaintiff, -against- STIPULATION MTA BUS COMPANY, NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, and JOHN DOE (intending to describe the operator of the bus described In the attached complaint, Defendant. ‘ xX IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED TO AND AGREED UPON, by and between the igned attorneys of record for the parties to the above entitled action, that the defendants MTA BUS COMPANY, NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, and JOHN DOE's Motion for Summary Judgment scheduled for October 1, 2015 be adjourned to November 20, 2015. to serve Opposition papers by November 6, 2015. Plaintiff IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT a photocopy of the signatures may be accepted | in place of the original signatures. Dated: Staten Island, New York September 29, 2015 TRACY, STILWELL & PARRINELLO, P.C. ARMIENTI, DEBELLIS, GUGLIELMO & i RHODEN, LLP t ee By GAETANO PARRINELLO Attorneys for Plaintiff By: of Coun StTo PRONG, Esq 94 Lincoln Avenue Attorneys forDefendants Staten Tsland, New York 10306 39 Broadway, Suite 520 (F) 718-442-0582 New York, New York 10006 (F) (212) 809-7713 TOTAL P.0O1