arrow left
arrow right
  • Clean Air Options, Llc, Eurus Air Design, Ab v. Humanscale Corporation Commercial Division document preview
						
                                

Preview

900 Third Avenue, 16th Floor New York, NY 10022-4728 212-752-8000 212-752-8393 fax — Arianna Frankl New Jersey Member — Admitted in NY and NJ Delaware — Reply to New York Office Writer’s Direct Line: 646-563-8943 Maryland Writer’s Direct Fax: 646-563-7943 — Writer’s E-Mail: afrankl@coleschotz.com Texas April 22, 2014 Via Electronic Filing Honorable Jeffrey K. Oing Supreme Court - Commercial Division Part 48, Courtroom 242 60 Centre St. New York, NY 10007 Re: Clean Air Options, LLC, et al. v. Humanscale Corp., Index No. 654595/2012 Dear Judge Oing: This firm represents Defendant, Humanscale Corp. (“Humanscale”), in the above-referenced matter. We are writing concerning Humanscale’s Motion for a Commission requesting the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey to issue a subpoena ad testificandum and duces tecum to non-party Tri-Dim Filter Corporation (the “Motion”). Plaintiffs filed an Affirmation in Partial Opposition to the Motion, and while Humanscale disputes Plaintiffs’ assertions therein, on the only issue before the Court of whether to issue the Commission, Plaintiffs confirmed they do not oppose. With the Motion now fully submitted, Humanscale respectfully requests a conference with the Court so that the Commission may be issued and discovery thereunder proceed as quickly as possible. Your Honor’s time and attention to this matter are greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, Arianna Frankl cc: Craig Holland, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs www.coleschotz.com 48128/0004-10538798v1