On December 31, 2012 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Clean Air Options, Llc,
Eurus Air Design, Ab,
and
Humanscale Corporation,
for Commercial Division
in the District Court of New York County.
Preview
YORK ND 65459
QUN
NYSCEF BOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK COUNTY.
PRESENT.
JEFFREYk.Komg
te
asc EY PART ff
Justice
‘\
Index Number : 654595/2012 INDEX NO.
CLEAN AIR OPTIONS, LLC
MOTION DATE
vs
HUMANSCALE CORPORATION MOTION SEQ. NO.
Sequence Number : 001
DISMIS:
The following papers, numbered 1 to , were read on this motion to/for
Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause — Affidavits — Exhibits No(s).
Answering Affidavits — Exhibits [Nojs),
Replying Affidavits [No(s),
Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is
“Motion is decided on the record
Transcript to be So Ordered
Parties to submit transcript
to the Court forthwith.”
Muo ut dvected dy ork
du hauseiet £ vem dm
J.S.C.
JEFFRE
K. YKOING
J. OING
4. CHECK ONE: ....ssecesees (7 CASE DISPOSED CXvon FINAL DISPOSITION
2. CHECK AS APPROPRIAT! JOTION IS: [| GRANTED CIDENIED () GRANTED IN PART THER
3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: CISETTLE ORDER (1 susMit ORDER
(JDO NOT POST CJFIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT =] REFERENCE
Document Filed Date
July 22, 2013
Case Filing Date
December 31, 2012
Category
Commercial Division
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
YORK ND 65459 QUN NYSCEF BOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY. PRESENT. JEFFREYk.Komg te asc EY PART ff Justice ‘\ Index Number : 654595/2012 INDEX NO. CLEAN AIR OPTIONS, LLC MOTION DATE vs HUMANSCALE CORPORATION MOTION SEQ. NO. Sequence Number : 001 DISMIS: The following papers, numbered 1 to , were read on this motion to/for Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause — Affidavits — Exhibits No(s). Answering Affidavits — Exhibits [Nojs), Replying Affidavits [No(s), Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is “Motion is decided on the record Transcript to be So Ordered Parties to submit transcript to the Court forthwith.” Muo ut dvected dy ork du hauseiet £ vem dm J.S.C. JEFFRE K. YKOING J. OING 4. CHECK ONE: ....ssecesees (7 CASE DISPOSED CXvon FINAL DISPOSITION 2. CHECK AS APPROPRIAT! JOTION IS: [| GRANTED CIDENIED () GRANTED IN PART THER 3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: CISETTLE ORDER (1 susMit ORDER (JDO NOT POST CJFIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT =] REFERENCE