On July 08, 1984 a
was filed
involving a dispute between
Yue, Xiao,
and
Chapp, Inc.,
Foerster, Cynthia,
for CIRCUIT CIVIL
in the District Court of Osceola County.
Preview
Filing # 109576890 E-Filed 06/30/2020 09:24:19 AM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA
XIAO SHENG YUE,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO.: 2020-CA-1106AN
v.
CYNTHIA M. FOERSTER AND
CHAPP, INC.,
Defendants.
/
DEFENDANT, CHAPP, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
ADMISSIONS
Defendant, CHAPP, INC., by and through its undersigned attorney hereby files this
Response to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions and states as follows:
1. Admitted.
2. Admitted.
3. Admitted.
4. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or
deny this request for admission.
5. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or
deny this request for admission. This defendant was not present in the vehicle with Foerster at
the time.
6. Admitted.
7. Denied.
8. Objection, this request for admissions seeks information that is neither relevant
nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving said
objection admitted.
9. Objection, this request for admissions seeks information that is neither relevant
nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving said
objection admitted.
10. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or
deny this request for admission. To the extent a response is required, however, denied.
11. Objection, this request for admissions seeks information that is neither relevant
nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving that
objection, denied.
12. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or
deny this request for admission. This defendant was not present in the vehicle with Foerster at
the time.
13. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or
deny this request for admission.
14. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or
deny this request for admission.
15. Denied.
16. Denied.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 24° day of March 2020, I electronically filed the
foregoing with the Clerk of the Court via the Florida Courts’ e-Filing Portal, pursuant to and in
compliance with Rule 2.516, Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, which completes service
by furnishing a true and correct copy of the foregoing via electronic mail to all counsel of record.
LAW OFFICES OF SANTEIRO & GARRISON
/s/ Jorge Santeiro
Jorge Santeiro, Esq.
FBN: 66230
6300 University Parkway
Suite 101
Sarasota, FL 34240
Tel: (941) 907-7895
Email: jsanteiro@fcci-group.com
Attorney for Defendants, HAYS HARVESTING,
INC. and JEFFERY ROBERTS
Document Filed Date
November 03, 2023
Case Filing Date
July 08, 1984
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Filing # 109576890 E-Filed 06/30/2020 09:24:19 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA XIAO SHENG YUE, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 2020-CA-1106AN v. CYNTHIA M. FOERSTER AND CHAPP, INC., Defendants. / DEFENDANT, CHAPP, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS Defendant, CHAPP, INC., by and through its undersigned attorney hereby files this Response to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions and states as follows: 1. Admitted. 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or deny this request for admission. 5. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or deny this request for admission. This defendant was not present in the vehicle with Foerster at the time. 6. Admitted. 7. Denied. 8. Objection, this request for admissions seeks information that is neither relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving said objection admitted. 9. Objection, this request for admissions seeks information that is neither relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving said objection admitted. 10. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or deny this request for admission. To the extent a response is required, however, denied. 11. Objection, this request for admissions seeks information that is neither relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Subject to and without waiving that objection, denied. 12. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or deny this request for admission. This defendant was not present in the vehicle with Foerster at the time. 13. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or deny this request for admission. 14. Based on the information presently available, this defendant is unable to admit or deny this request for admission. 15. Denied. 16. Denied. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 24° day of March 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court via the Florida Courts’ e-Filing Portal, pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 2.516, Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, which completes service by furnishing a true and correct copy of the foregoing via electronic mail to all counsel of record. LAW OFFICES OF SANTEIRO & GARRISON /s/ Jorge Santeiro Jorge Santeiro, Esq. FBN: 66230 6300 University Parkway Suite 101 Sarasota, FL 34240 Tel: (941) 907-7895 Email: jsanteiro@fcci-group.com Attorney for Defendants, HAYS HARVESTING, INC. and JEFFERY ROBERTS