arrow left
arrow right
  • HILL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET CARLTON DECEASED, CHELSEA vs. LOPEZ, LEONEL D.O.PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE-MEDICAL document preview
  • HILL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET CARLTON DECEASED, CHELSEA vs. LOPEZ, LEONEL D.O.PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE-MEDICAL document preview
  • HILL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET CARLTON DECEASED, CHELSEA vs. LOPEZ, LEONEL D.O.PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE-MEDICAL document preview
  • HILL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET CARLTON DECEASED, CHELSEA vs. LOPEZ, LEONEL D.O.PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE-MEDICAL document preview
  • HILL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET CARLTON DECEASED, CHELSEA vs. LOPEZ, LEONEL D.O.PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE-MEDICAL document preview
  • HILL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET CARLTON DECEASED, CHELSEA vs. LOPEZ, LEONEL D.O.PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE-MEDICAL document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 145833880 E-Filed 03/16/2022 02:23:16 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 19 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 21-610-CA CHELSEA HILL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Margaret Carlton, deceased, Plaintiff, LEONEL LOPEZ, D.O.; PARAGON CONTRACTING SERVICE, LLC; MICHAEL MALTMAN, M.D.; TREASURE COAST TOPDOC, PLLC; MARTIN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., d/b/a CLEVELAND CLINIC TRADITION HOSPITAL; and MARTIN MEMORIAL PHYSICIAN CORPORATION, INC., d/b/a MARTIN HEALTH PHYSICIAN GROUP, PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO NOTICE OF PRODUCTION OF NON PARTY AND/OR REQUEST FOR COPIES Plaintiff, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.351, objects to Defendants’ Notice of Production from Non-Party dated March 10 , 2022, and directed to the records custodian of: Plaintiff objects and will only agree if the following conditions below are strictly complied with. By issuing any Subpoena, or causing any Subpoena to be issued, Defendants agree to be strictly bound by the conditions below. 1. No third party shall be used to receive and copy anything received in response to any Subpoena. Angelides v. Boyes, No. 2012 CA 01697 (Fla. 12 Cir. Ct.); Vorse v. Jones, No. 2011 CA 05779 (Fla. 12 Cir. Ct. Nov. 9, 2012). No third party shall sign any Subpoena for Defendant. See id. No third party shall issue any Subpoena for Defendant. See id 2. Defense counsel shall provide readable copies (color when produced in color) in PDF format to Plaintiff’s counsel of everything produced in response to the Subpoena referred to in the Notice(s) of Production from Non-Party within ten days after Defendant’s counsel received the items. Service of the copies shall be by email or digital storage device. Responding counsel agrees to not add, change, or alter the records received and provided such as names, identifiers Bates stamps, and the like. The records shall be provided in the exact form received by the party who served the NPNP subpoena. By issuing the subpoena, the party agrees to this provision. 3. Films, photographs, videos, etc. shall be produced in the format the recipient produced them in. 4. The Subpoena does not allow Defendants’ counsel to have discussions with any recipient of the Subpoena. ., §456.057(7)(a), Fla. Stat. 5. Obtaining medical records or protected health information in violation of section 456.057 is a crime. State v. Kutik 6. The Subpoena is not continuing in nature and cannot be used to request documents from the recipient at a later date. Figaro v. Bacon-Green, 734 So. 2d 579, 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). 7. If Defense Counsel wants additional things produced from a recipient of a Subpoena, then it shall begin the process states in Rule 1.351 anew, See id 8. Payment for the reasonable cost for the requested copies shall not be due until Plaintiff’s counsel receives the copies and a statement for reasonable copying costs. 9. Defendant is prohibited from using anything and information obtained in violation of this Objection. See Bradley v. Brotman, 836 So. 2d 1129, 1134 (Fla. 4 10. In agreement with numbers 1-9, pursuant to Rule 1.351(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby requests Defendant to furnish Plaintiff with a legible copy of each item furnished to Defendant by non-parties pursuant to the Notice of Intent to Serve a Subpoena Pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.921 & 1.351 served by Defendant, on March 10 , 2022, and directed to the Records Custodian of: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY a copy of the foregoing was filed with the Eportal who will serve copies of same on: sent by electronic mail to Thomas Aubin, Esq., Stearns Weaver, et al., 200 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 2100, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301, (mpodolnick@stearnsweaver.com; taubin@stearnsweaver.com; aspencer@stearnsweaver.com), James White, Esq, White & Russell, P.A., 11641 Kew Gardens Avenue, Suite 101, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 white@wrtrial.com walsh@wrtrial.com leone@wrtrial.com parker@wrtrial.com wanser@wrtrial.com pleadings@wrtrial.com) and Robert Paradela, Esq., Wicker Smith, et al., 515 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1400, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (ftlcrtpleadings@wickersmith.com day of March, 2022. RUBENSTEIN LAW, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Robert Callahan Miami, FL 33156 Email: bonnie@rubensteinlaw.com efabricant@rubensteinlaw.com eservice@rubensteinlaw.com /s/ Bonnie Navin Bonnie Navin, Esquire Florida Bar: 487759