arrow left
arrow right
  • CALZADA, ASHLEY vs. OSCEOLA REGIONAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE document preview
  • CALZADA, ASHLEY vs. OSCEOLA REGIONAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE document preview
  • CALZADA, ASHLEY vs. OSCEOLA REGIONAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE document preview
  • CALZADA, ASHLEY vs. OSCEOLA REGIONAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE document preview
  • CALZADA, ASHLEY vs. OSCEOLA REGIONAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE document preview
  • CALZADA, ASHLEY vs. OSCEOLA REGIONAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 143954962 E-Filed 02/15/2022 01:58:40 PM ; IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.:. 2017 -CA-000174 MP CIVIL DIVISION: 20 TODD COPELAND, Esquire, as Guardian Ad Litem for J.C., a Minor, and as Trustee of the J.C. Special Needs Trust, ASHLEY CALZADA and JUAN L. CALZADA, individually and on behalf of J. C., a Minor, Plaintiffs, vs. OSCEOLA REGIONAL HOSPITAL d/b/a OSCEOLA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; ERIK FRENDAK, CRNA.; OSCEOLA OB/GYN; MICHAEL R. DENARDIS, D.O.; OB HOSPITALIST GROUP, LLC.; EZER A. OJEDA, M.D.; OSCEOLA ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, PL.; RODNEY DEL VALLE, M.D.; PEDIATRIX MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; PEDIATRIX MEDICAL GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC.; MEDNAX, INC.; JOSE I. GIERBOLINI, M.D.; JOHN LONGHI, M_D.; . HCA, INC.; _ HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC.; and HCA HEALTHCARE SERVICES-FLORIDA, INC., Defendants. / ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RECONSIDER OR REHEAR THE ORDER GRANTING HCA’S AMENDED AND RESTATED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE came before the Court for consideration, on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider or Rehear the Order Granting HCA’s Amended and Restated Motion for Summary Judgment (filed on December 23, 2021), and the Court having reviewed the Motion, together with Defendant, HCA, Inc.’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Rehearing (filed on January 18, 2022), and Plaintiffs’ Reply to HCA’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider or Rehear (filed on January 20, 2022) and being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider or Rehear the Order Granting HCA’s Amended and Restated Motion for Summary Judgment, is hereby DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida, on this. [& day of February, 2022. MARGARET H. SCHREIBER CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail or by electronic filing by using the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal System on this Is day of Cet pucrs , 2022 to: Carlos R. Diez-Arguelles, Esquire, mail(@theorlandolawyers.com, leah@theorlandolawyers.com, Thomas E. Dukes, III, Esquire, nos@mmdorLcom, tdukes@mmdorl.com, rosborne@mmdorl.com, Pierre J. Seacord, Esquire, service-seacord(@ringerhenry.com, service-all(@ringerhenry.com, Kurt M. Spengler, Esquire, orlertpleadings@wickersmith.com, kspengler@wickersmith.com, kspigle(@wickersmith.com, Eric F. Ochotorena, Esquire, efo.service@rissman.com, cmb.service@rissman.com, Patrick H. Telan, Esquire, phtelan@growerketcham.com, enotice@growerketcham.com, cboals(@growerketcham.com, Craig Foels, Esquire, csf@eifg-law.com, nld(@eifg-law.com, David S. Nelson, Esquire, dnelson@ljglegal.com, Inader/@ljglegal.com, John D. Emmanuel, Esquire, john.emmanuel(@bipc.com, and Paul R. Borr, Esquire, pborr@tachebronis.com, service(@tachebronis.com. nL) Aen Judicial AssiStant