We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Aleksandar Zunzurovski v. Michael Wright

A Torts - Other (Unjust Enrichment) case was filed by (Subcribe to view) represented by (Subcribe to view) against (Subscribe to view) represented by (Subscribe to view) in the jurisdiction of New York County. Judge Dakota D. Ramseur presiding.

Case Details

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)   

Filing Date

August 29, 2023

Last Refreshed

January 25, 2024

Filing Location

New York County, NY

Judge

Hon. Dakota D. Ramseur Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Dakota D. Ramseur   

Category

Torts - Other (Unjust Enrichment)

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

General Torts

Overview

This is an action for monetary and declaratory relief to redress the Defendants' violation of the

Plaintiffs' rights. The plaintiff seeks relief for Unjust Enrichment.

At all times relevant to this Complaint, the Defendant was an employee of Sapphire.

Upon information and belief, Wright worked as a "Host" or manager of the dancers and junior staff

during their employment with Sapphire.

On or about April 5, 2019, Maria Vasquez (“Vasquez”), a former dancer and employee of Sapphire,

sat for a deposition (“Vasquez Depo”) in a lawsuit she filed against Sapphire, James Mark Talla,

Jeffrey Wasserman, and Glen Peter Bernardi. This matter was held before Arbitrator Martin F.

Scheinman.

During the Vasquez Depo, Plaintiff and Wright were named as “Hosts” who allegedly sexually

harassed and or assaulted Vasquez.

On or about April 12, 2019, Natalia Titova (“Titova”), a former dancer and employee of Sapphire,

sat for a deposition (“Titova Depo”) in a lawsuit she filed against Sapphire, James Mark Talla,

Jeffrey Wasserman, and Glen Peter Bernardi. This matter was held before Arbitrator Martin F.

Scheinman.

During the Titova Depo, Plaintiff and Wright were named as “Hosts” who allegedly sexually

harassed and or assaulted Titova.

At the end of their arbitrations, Vasquez and Titova were awarded a total of $1,375,000.00.

On or about December 2016, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Sapphire (“P. Sapphire lawsuit”) and

David Michael Talla for FLSA and the regulations thereto; and according to the NYLL (§ 650 et

seq.) and the New York Commissioner of Labor’s Wage Order (the “Wage Orders,”) codified at 12

N.Y.C.R.R. 146 et seq., based upon the following acts and/or omissions which Defendants

committed: i. Defendants' failure to compensate Plaintiff for all hours worked at the statutory

minimum wage as required by federal and state law and regulations; ii. Defendant's failure to

provide Plaintiff with spread-of-hours payments under 12 NYCRR 146-1.6 and 137-1.7; iii.

Causes of Action

1. UNJUST ENRICHMENT

Case Complaint Summary

This complaint is a legal document filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The plaintiff, Aleksandar Zunzurovski, is suing the defendant, Michael Wright, for unjust enrichment. Zunzurovski alleges that Wright, who…...

Parties

Plaintiffs

Aleksandar Zunzurovski

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Blackburn, Tyrone Anthony

Defendants

Michael Wright

Attorneys for Defendants

Kimmel, Jeffrey A.
Yaqoob, Mohammad Adil

Case Documents

Case Events

Type Description
LETTER / CORRESPONDENCE TO JUDGE
Letter Brief in Opposition to Defendants Letter Dated January 5, 2024
LETTER / CORRESPONDENCE TO JUDGE
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN REPLY (Motion #001) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR IN THE ALTE
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR IN THE ALTE ... show more
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN REPLY (Motion #001) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR IN THE ALTE
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR IN THE ALTE ... show more
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION
STIPULATION - ADJOURNMENT OF MOTION -IN SUBMISSIONS PART -RM 130
EXHIBIT(S) - B (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT B TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - D (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT D TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
RJI -RE: NOTICE OF MOTION
EXHIBIT(S) - L (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT L TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - A (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT A TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION (Motion #001)
AFFIRMATION OF JEFFREY A. KIMMEL
EXHIBIT(S) - J (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT J TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
NOTICE OF MOTION (Motion #001)
NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO DISMISS THE ACTION
EXHIBIT(S) - G (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT G TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - K (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT K TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - E (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT E TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - I (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT I TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - F (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT F TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - H (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT H TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
EXHIBIT(S) - C (Motion #001)
EXHIBIT C TO KIMMEL AFFIRMATION
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT (Motion #001) MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO DIS
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO DIS ... show more
SUMMONS + COMPLAINT

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope

Your free document request was received.

Your request has been received. We will email you this document within 4 business hours.

You have used out of 0 document requests this month.

Continue

Document Requested

You have exceeded your document request limit for this month.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact support@trellis.law

Continue
Docket Refresh Requested

Your docket refresh request has been received. You will receive a notification when the docket is refreshed.

Docket Refresh Requested

A refresh is already in progress.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact support@trellis.law

Continue